VIII. Swellengrebel to J.A. Baron van Plettenberg,
Schoonoord, 3.11.1779
Young Artoys whom I had met on board the ship on which J.J. le Sueur's son travelled, informed me that there were a few burghers who had come here to hand over some complaints to the Company. I advised him to tell them to confine themselves to general issues, such as difficulties in finding a market, and not to make personal attacks nor to forget the respect that is due to the government. I refused to receive a visit from them, but the Hon. Van der Oudermeulen asked me to join him in Amsterdam to find out just what was at issue. I discovered that their attitude towards some people was bitter, though some complaints were obviously exaggerated and can be refuted. I am aware, knowing your magnanimous nature, how unpleasant you must find all these difficulties which have erupted during your term of office. We concluded that I ought to interview the First Advocate - without disclosing the nature of the charges - and suggest that it might be best for them to address the XVII over a general plan of reform for the Colony and hold back their individual complaints, which I would try to induce them to do. But I had the ill fortune to differ from this gentleman over the degree of freedom there ought to be in the Burgher community, as I was of the opinion that each individual must have the assurance that neither his person nor his goods might be touched except through a lawful sentence imposed by a judge competent to try his case; and that, although in times of trouble the Burgomasters of Netherlands Towns were empowered to exile a citizen on political grounds, this was a quite extraordinary remedy confined to such times. Moreover, such an exile could appeal to the States.
After much discussion we reached agreement that I should continue to work on my plan, merely to keep the affair from coming out into the open, and recommend a good advocate to the burghers. Boers suggested Advocate Calkoen and I undertook to put his name forward. They appeared receptive to my advice to draw up two memorials; one, for general redress, to be handed in, and the second, containing particular grievances, to be held in reserve. But they would not hear of a change of advocate.
In a subsequent discussion with First Advocate Boers, we again differed so widely that I realized it was useless to ask the burghers not to air their individual grievances without any assurance that Boers would treat their complaints seriously on their merits. I therefore withdrew from the affair. The burghers would not appoint Advocate Calkoen, although their own advocate fell sick. I was afraid they might pick one who would