van Jabeer, 1984), every one of them as cruel and irresistible as anything that Angela Carter ever wrote.
But Kousbroek is best known for his essays. In the sixties, writing under the pen name Leopold de Buch, he reported from Paris on the upheavals of 1968 in the leading progressive weekly Vrij Nederland. Under his own name he published many more essays, in journals and magazines such as Hollands Maandblad, De Gids and NRC-Handelsblad. From 1969 onwards, the most important of these have been collected in a long and often reprinted series of volumes, beginning with Anathemas and The Strokeability Factor (De aaibaarheidsfactor) and continuing to the present day. In 1978 he was awarded the highest honour in Dutch literature, the P.C. Hooft Prize, but in a sense this was only the beginning, since his most important works were yet to come.
Central to Kousbroek's writing is his running battle against superstition and the irrationalism of those who feel more attracted to incomprehensible ‘deep’ ideas than to disciplined abstract thought. As an antidote Kousbroek offers analysis and criticism - in his playful and taboo-breaking essays of the sixties, on the discovery of sexuality, on sexual freedom and toleration, and on the rhetoric of pornography, just as much as in his fiery polemics against the obscurantist tendencies of fellow Dutch writers such as Gerard Reve and Harry Mulisch. The former is taken to task for his bourgeois sentimentality and his bigotry, the latter for the scientific ignorance that underpins his philosophical system. Like a second Voltaire, Kousbroek is taking the moral temperature of the nation, and his essays - whether they attack the Dutch lack of a sense of their own history, the imbecility of children's TV, or the disappearance of a basic human emotion such as misericordia from the Netherlands - amount to a sustained critique of the cultural poverty of Dutch society today.
The same sharply critical approach also informs his many contributions on the history of Dutch colonialism. In 1992 the most important of these were collected in The East Indies Camp Syndrome (Het Oostindisch kampsyndroom). The centrepiece of this volume is a comparative study of Studs Terkel's The Good War (1986), the searching French war documentary Le chagrin et la pitié (1970) by Marcel Ophuls, and the silences and clichés surrounding the Dutch actions during the Indonesian war of independence (1945-1950). Other case histories expose the tissue of myths and fictions that holds sway in Dutch colonial historiography. Here again, we find many fiercely polemical exchanges with other writers such as Jeroen Brouwers, whose account of life in a Japanese internment camp, in his novel Sunken Red (Bezonken rood, 1981; tr. 1992), was comprehensively demolished by Kousbroek. Both because of its critical approach and its documentary value, The East Indies Camp Syndrome is required reading for anyone trying to understand the colonial culture and society of the former Dutch East Indies which came to an inglorious end under Japanese and Indonesian attack.
On a more personal note there is his Return to the Lan of Ori Gin (Terug naar Negri Pan Erkoms, 1995), an account of a journey back to the land of his early youth. Some of the most haunting memories in this book revolve around his time in boarding school in Sumatra before the war, compared to which, as he once remarked, the Japanese internment camp was almost a holiday. Ever since the war Japan has been one of Kousbroek's most central interests, and one can only hope that his essays on this subject will soon be collected into one volume too. What we do have, in his travelogue In the Time Machine through Japan: the Court Journey of 2000 (In de tijdmachine door Japan: De Hofreis van