um term the newspaper will become part of the electronic information stream predicted by scholars like Manuel Castells. At the same time new chances for written journalism, in whatever material form, will emerge, depending on how strong the need for local and regional news supply in a global world will be. The written word will also remain leading in the field of critical, intellectual and investigative journalism.
Saskia C.J. de Vries The future of the monograph in the digital era. A university press perspective
The new opportunities offered by the Internet for the diffusion of scholarly information are causing thorough changes in the position of existing parties like authors, universities, libraries, and readers, as well as attracting entirely new players, like Google and Amazon.com. Regarding the present developments in a historical context this article discusses the impart of digitisation on the scholarly monograph, especially in relation to the recent history of scholarly journals, including the Open Access movement, which is fast finding wider acceptance. In spite of all speculations to the contrary the printed book has still not been superseded by its digital counterparts. Yet there is every reason to be concerned about the future of the scholarly monograph in its familiar form. While there may be intrinsic reasons why certain scholarly arguments would benefit most from conventional book form, and while digital printing techniques, by enabling shorter print runs, will allow more titles to be ‘in print’, other digital developments militate against the continued existence of scholarly monographs in the form of printed books.
Willem Heijting The book between the media. About the framework and foundations of book historical research
The neglect of the theoretical base of the discipline is typical for book historical research in the Netherlands - and not only there. The rise of new media which seem to supplant the printed book only serves to add to the uncertainty about the theory of book and print studies. So it would be good if a discussion took place about the framework and foundations of book historical research.
This article gives an overview and critical analysis of the leading theoretical approaches in this field since the beginning of the twentieth century, revealing some of their strong and weak sides. The New Bibliography School, led by R.B. McKerrow and others, has mainly focused on textual transmission, which has left deep marks in later book historical practice. The l'histoire du livre school of the French Annales historians studied the social and cultural effects of books on society. Book historians in the Netherlands followed both traditions, but they were also influenced by Robert Darnton. His communication circuit brought some order to the steadily expanding field of book history. Elizabeth Eisenstein's interpretation of the impact of the printing press, however controversial it was, did not invoke much discussion in the Netherlands. In recent years, the work of D.F. McKenzie, whose Bibliography and the sociology of texts has also appeared in a Dutch translation, has drawn attention. McKenzie advocated a text-based history of the book (which in his view encompasses a wide range of text-related artefacts), while incorporating elements of the French tradition.
All of these approaches fail to take into account the wider context of the history of the printed book in a history of the media. As a vital discipline, book history should free itself from the text-based approach inherited from the New Bibliography, and the printed book should be studied as a medium between other media, like the oral and written media, as well as radio, film, television, and the digital media.