Uitzondering op de regel
(2008)–Lenny Vos– Auteursrechtelijk beschermdDe positie van vrouwelijke auteurs in het naoorlogse Nederlandse literaire veld
[pagina 243]
| |
[pagina 245]
| |
Exception to the rule
| |
[pagina 246]
| |
The third chapter of the dissertation is focused on the last three decades of the twentieth century, a period during which there have been major changes in society regarding the position of women. Education and career opportunities have improved significantly for Dutch women since the sixties. But are these developments reflected in women's participation in the literary field, beyond their publication of primary works of literature? In this chapter I analyse the ways in which male and female authors participate in ancillary literary activities, particularly at the beginning of their career. These important activities include the publication of shorter prose or poetry in literary periodicals, and critical writing for newspapers and cultural magazines. More administrative or organisational activities, such as the editorship of a literary magazine or membership of a jury for awarding a literary prize, also feature in an overview of ancillary activities in the literary field.
Some of these secondary literary activities have seen increased numbers of female participants in the last three decades of the twentieth century. In the nineties, for example, women published more often (proportionally) in literary magazines than their male contemporaries. The number of female writers who play their part in literary prize juries has also increased markedly in the eighties and nineties. However, fewer female writers take part in reflective activities such as publishing critical writings which provide an opportunity for authors to express their own aesthetic principles.
The second part of the dissertation - chapter 4, 5 and 6 - moves from a quantitative approach to a more qualitative discussion of the position of women writers in the Dutch literary field over the last three decades of the twentieth century. In order to investigate the sociology of literary success, I follow the careers of three female authors who have started publishing in the three successive decades. By means of case studies, I demonstrate in detail how these women have made themselves known in the literary world. The studies provide examples of the positive effects of ancillary literary activities on the critical reception of their work.
In the 1970s, at the beginning of her career, Mensje van Keulen was the only female editor of a literary magazine, an exceptional position which contributed to her social and cultural capital and had a positive effect on the reception of her literary work in the long term. The first novel of Nelleke Noordervliet, published in 1987, was part of the revival of the historical novel. By giving lectures and writing reviews in the beginning of her career, Noordervliet entered into the public debate about the function of history and the genre of the historical novel. Manon Uphoff started her career in the nineties and is a successful example of the way in which women writers are tending to gain symbolic capital and are considering writing as a profession.
In addition to putting flesh on the statistical bones of the first section of the dissertation, these case studies demonstrate some fascinating developments within the Dutch literary field towards the end of the twentieth century. They not only reveal some significant changes in the place of women within the world of Dutch literature, but also highlight the shifting importance of institutions such as literary magazines, major publishers and literary prizes to the establishment of literary reputations. |
|