| appendix
This appendix, which can be downloaded from the website of the ECPR Press (www.ecprnet.eu/ecprpress/daalder), contains three discussion papers on the development of political science in Europe in the last thirty years, and three working documents for a comparative study of the smaller European democracies as elaborated by leading scholars in the 1960s.
Appendix 1 is an address given at the Joint Sessions of the ECPR in 1979 when I laid down the Chairmanship, as the second ECPR Chairman after Stein Rokkan (1970-1976). It contains an assessment of the state and potential of political science in Europe at that time. I looked back at that statement thirty years later at the Round Table organized at the 40th anniversary Joint Sessions in Münster in April 2010, see Hans Daalder ‘Political Science in Europe and the ECPR: Looking Back and Looking On,’ in European Political Science 9 (2010) Supplement 1, S30-S37.
Appendix 2 contains the text of a paper presented at the Second Colloquium on European-American Relations, organized by Samuel P. Huntington in Talloires, France from 6-10 September 1987. It analyzes key problems facing European countries at that time which are still high on the agenda after almost a quarter of a century later.
Appendix 3 faces the issue whether one can speak of ‘A European Political Science’, in an unpublished paper presented during a symposium on 18-19 September 1997 held to honour Stefano Bartolini at the end of his appointment as Professor of Political Science at the European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
Appendix 4 contains three basic documents on a research project for a comparative study of Smaller European Democracies in the 1960s, proposed first by Hans Daalder and Val R. Lorwin, who were later joined as editors by Stein Rokkan and Robert A. Dahl. They show an increasingly ambitious research scheme elaborated by a larger group of European political scientists (see details in the Introduction of this volume). Their value is not in its implementation, but as an illustration of how an international group of scholars saw the requirements of serious country studies in a comparative perspective half a century ago.